• Search by category

  • Show all

Site selection - getting it right

July 17, 2017
 - Tim Hardman

High functioning investigator sites are essential to the delivery of a successful clinical trial. But not all sites seem able to fulfil their study requirements. The critical question is how do you identify sites that are most likely to deliver your study on time, on budget and on specification? Below is an overview of key challenges, solutions, and opportunities related to clinical trial site selection that we recently detailed in our recent Insider's Insight [1]:

Challenges in Clinical Trial Site Selection

Limited Access to Qualified Sites: Finding sites with the necessary infrastructure, experience, and access to patient populations for specific therapeutic areas can be difficult.

Inconsistent Site Performance: Some sites may have excellent recruitment rates but poor data quality or compliance issues, while others may struggle with enrolment.

Regulatory and Ethical Considerations: Regulatory environments vary between regions and countries, affecting how quickly sites can be activated and how trials are conducted.

Geographic Diversity: Trials may need to be conducted across various geographic locations to ensure diverse patient populations, but logistical and communication challenges increase as sites are added in different regions.

Recruitment and Retention Challenges: Even when sites are qualified, recruiting and retaining the right patient population can be difficult, especially in competitive markets or for rare diseases.

Site Readiness and Start-up Delays: A significant amount of time can be lost waiting for sites to be ready, especially when dealing with administrative delays, lack of staff, or delays in ethics approvals.

Technology and Data Management Gaps: Not all sites may have access to or be proficient in the technologies required for modern clinical trials, such as electronic data capture (EDC) systems or remote monitoring tools.

 

Solutions to Overcome Site Selection Challenges

Data-Driven Site Selection: Use real-world data (RWD) and historical performance metrics to identify high-performing sites with experience in the specific therapeutic area. Leveraging predictive analytics and artificial intelligence (AI) can improve site selection accuracy by forecasting recruitment potential and site performance.

Site feasibility assessments: Conduct thorough site feasibility assessments, including site visits and interviews with key staff, to evaluate their infrastructure, staff expertise, patient population access, and regulatory readiness.

Streamlined regulatory approvals: Work closely with local regulatory authorities and ethics committees early in the process to ensure faster regulatory approvals. Leverage centralised IRB (Institutional Review Board) or ethics committee models where possible to speed up review and approval times.

Patient-centric approach: Engage sites that have established relationships with patient advocacy groups or have access to specific patient registries. This improves recruitment by focusing on patient needs and minimising the barriers to participation.

Technology and training support: Provide sites with the necessary tools, such as EDC platforms, electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO) systems, and remote monitoring technologies. Invest in training to ensure site staff can effectively use these technologies, thus improving data quality and reducing errors.

Site relationship management: Develop strong partnerships with sites, providing continuous support and fostering open communication. This includes offering feedback on performance, providing incentives for achieving recruitment targets, and addressing any challenges that arise during the trial.

Utilise hybrid and decentralised trials: Implement decentralised or hybrid trial models that allow some trial procedures (such as patient monitoring or follow-up visits) to be done remotely. This can increase the pool of potential sites and make it easier to recruit diverse populations by reducing the burden on patients and sites.

Centralised site management and oversight: Adopt a centralized management approach for multi-site trials to improve coordination and consistency in trial conduct. Regular monitoring, communication, and real-time access to data help address challenges quickly.

Risk-based monitoring: Implement risk-base monitoring (RBM) strategies to optimise resource allocation. Focusing monitoring efforts on high-risk sites or processes can reduce costs and ensure better compliance and data quality.

Global and Cultural Adaptation: For multinational trials, adapt protocols and materials to fit the cultural and healthcare infrastructure contexts of different regions. Consider language differences, local medical practices, and patient expectations.

 

Opportunities for Improvement and Innovation

Collaborative networks: Engage in collaborative networks of sites (e.g., Site Management Organizations or SMOs) that have a proven track record of running successful trials. These networks have standardized processes and can help accelerate site identification and start-up.

Precision recruitment using digital tools: Digital search tools can help analyse large datasets to identify optimal sites and predict patient recruitment rates as well as identify underutilised patient populations through social media outreach or direct-to-patient campaigns.

Patient registries and real-world data: Use patient registries and real world data (RWD) sources, such as electronic health records (EHRs) and insurance databases, to identify eligible patients and inform site selection. This can help prioritise sites where patient populations are concentrated, reducing recruitment delays.

Decentralised clinical trials: Expanding decentralised trial models that rely on telemedicine, wearables, and home health services can widen the pool of potential sites and patients. This is especially beneficial in reaching underserved populations or those with mobility limitations.

Global site expansion: Developing countries present untapped opportunities for site expansion. With the right training and infrastructure development, these regions can provide access to new patient populations while maintaining cost-effective site operations.

Enhanced Patient Engagement Tools: Leveraging mobile apps, patient portals, and wearable devices for real-time patient engagement, monitoring, and retention can help sites maintain high levels of participation and protocol adherence.

 

Conclusion

Site selection, an often underrated and poorly understood discipline. Addressing clinical trial site selection challenges requires a combination of data-driven decision-making, technology adoption, and strategic partnerships. By implementing solutions like data analytics, decentralised trial models, and enhanced site management practices, sponsors and CROs can overcome many of the barriers to site selection. Since poor site selection can have an impact on study delivery (and possibly your short term career prospects) you want to be sure you make the right decisions.

About the author

Tim Hardman
Managing Director
View profile
Dr Tim Hardman is Managing Director of Niche Science & Technology Ltd., a bespoke services CRO based in the UK. He also serves as Managing Director at Thromboserin Ltd., an early-stage biotechnology company. Dr Hardman is a keen scientist and an occasional commentator on all aspects of medicine, business and the process of drug development.

Related Articles

Get our latest news and publications

Sign up to our news letter

© 2025 Niche.org.uk     All rights reserved

HomePrivacy policy Corporate Social Responsibility