• Search by category

  • Show all

Guideline update for communicating company-sponsored research (GPP3)

September 15, 2015
 - Tim Hardman

A new guidance document for the publication of company-sponsored medical research, has been published online today by the Annals of Internal Medicine [1]. Termed Good Publication Practice 3 (GPP3) the full article describing the guidelines can be accessed at the URL provided below. GPP3 is an update of the original Good Publication Practice (GPP) guidelines, which were originally published in 2003 and updated for the first time in 2009 [2].

In support of GPP3, the International Society for Medical Publication Professionals has also set up a page dedicated to the guidelines. The new guideline includes sections on data sharing, studies that should be published and plagiarism that were not adequately covered in earlier versions. It also expands on the criteria for authorship and author payment/reimbursement and issues related to credibility, integrity, and ethical standards in medical publications, as well as providing additional information on the role of medical writers. In summary, the key principles of GPP3 include:

Transparency and Integrity: It emphasises the importance of disclosing financial and non-financial conflicts of interest, ensuring that company-sponsored research is clearly identified as such, and providing proper attribution for all contributors, including medical writers.

Authorship Criteria: GPP3 follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) guidelines for authorship. All authors must meet specific criteria, including significant contributions to the study, drafting or critically revising the manuscript, and approving the final version.

Accurate and Balanced Reporting: Research findings, whether positive or negative, should be reported accurately and without bias. This includes publishing all relevant data and making results available to the public in a timely manner, even if the outcomes are not favorable to the sponsor.

Ethical Considerations: GPP3 stresses the ethical obligation to ensure patient confidentiality, to avoid plagiarism, and to not engage in ghostwriting. All roles, including those of sponsors, should be clearly defined and disclosed.

Timely and Accessible Communication: It encourages prompt dissemination of research results in a way that is accessible to healthcare professionals, patients, and the public. This includes using peer-reviewed journals and ensuring that research is freely available where possible.

Overall, GPP3 promotes ethical practices to ensure that company-sponsored medical research is communicated transparently and credibly, maintaining public trust in the scientific process.

References

  1. Battisiti WP, et al. Good Publication Practice for Communicating Company-Sponsored Medical Research: GPP3 Annals Int Med 2015; 163:461 - 464.
  2. Graf C, et al. Good publication practice for communicating company sponsored medical research: the GPP2 guidelines BMJ 2009; 339 :b4330

 

 

About the author

Tim Hardman
Managing Director
View profile
Dr Tim Hardman is Managing Director of Niche Science & Technology Ltd., a bespoke services CRO based in the UK. He also serves as Managing Director at Thromboserin Ltd., an early-stage biotechnology company. Dr Hardman is a keen scientist and an occasional commentator on all aspects of medicine, business and the process of drug development.

Related Articles

Get our latest news and publications

Sign up to our news letter

© 2025 Niche.org.uk     All rights reserved

HomePrivacy policy Corporate Social Responsibility