
Editing Your Own Writing
For anyone writing in pharma: how to assess and edit your own documents for clarity and accuracy.
Download the free guideClinical Operations
Clinical Project ManagementStudy Monitoring and Site ManagementTrial Master File and Document ManagementQuality and Vendor Management SystemsStudy DocumentsRegulatory Affairs
Regulatory StrategyRegulatory WritingAgency Communications and SubmissionsDocument Editorial, QC and SubmissionQC, Review and RedactionLegal RepresentationPharmacovigilanceILAP SubmissionsMedical Communications
Publication PlanningStrategic CommunicationsScientific CommunicationsMedical EducationMedical IllustrationGrant Applications and Project PartnershipInsider’s Insights / The Discipline of Concision
Concision in medical writing is not an aesthetic preference; it is a professional obligation. This guide shows how to write tightly across regulatory documents, lay summaries and manuscripts, without cutting what has to stay.
Six things you will be able to do after reading this guide.
Regulatory documents, lay summaries and manuscripts each need a different kind of concision.
Nominalisations, habitual passives and filler phrases, with before-and-after examples.
A five-step self-review process, from the cooling-off break to the checklist audit.
What must never be cut: stopping rules, safety narratives and rare but serious adverse reactions.
Where language models help, where they fabricate or exaggerate, and how to verify their output.
How lay summaries, structured protocols and full reports link together without repetition.
Three quick questions taken from the guide. Test what you already know.
0of 3 correct so far
Question 1 of 3
What is the longest sentence the UK Health Research Authority recommends for a lay summary?
Question 2 of 3
In a study of ten language models summarising research, how many systematically exaggerated the original claims?
Question 3 of 3
Safety information that appears in the protocol, IB, consent form and study report should be…
The guide covers each of these in depth, from sentence-level editing to the use of AI.
Download the free guideA few of the 14 pages, so you know exactly what you are getting.
The apparent tension between concision and compliance is usually a failure of analysis. Regulatory templates prescribe content, not word count, ensuring required information is complete and consistently presented. Look for redundancy within sections, using cross-references such as “see Section 5.2” or “as summarised in Table 7” to avoid unnecessary repetition.
The line is where simplification changes meaning. Explain essential technical terms at first use and replace jargon with familiar language where possible, for example, “efficacy” with “how well the treatment worked”. Readability checkers can flag potentially difficult sentences, but asking a colleague to explain the text in their own words remains the most reliable test.
LLMs can help identify repetition, suggest alternative phrasing and shorten text, but the shortened version must preserve the original meaning. They can overgeneralise, and verification may consume much of the time saved. Use them for low-risk, easily checked tasks such as identifying long sentences, suggesting active-voice alternatives or flagging redundant phrases. The writer must retain control and responsibility for the final text, while also protecting intellectual property.
Build structure into your own review process by separating writing from reviewing. Write the document, do something else for at least 30 minutes, then return and ask: “What is this sentence doing?” If the answer is not immediately clear, revise it. A checklist based on the document requirements can replace the questions an external editor might ask.
Assessing your own writing: the companion to this guide’s self-review section.
Clinical, regulatory and scientific documents written, edited and quality checked by experienced medical writers.
Editing, quality control and formatting of clinical and regulatory documents before submission.