The most expensive place to find an error in a clinical or regulatory document is after it has been submitted. Quality control review provides the systematic, independent check that reduces that risk considerably.
At Niche, our QC reviewers bring the same scientific and regulatory rigour to this work as to document preparation itself, because the stakes are the same.
We provide independent QC review for clinical and regulatory documents produced both by Niche and by other organisations. Independent review, carried out by someone who has not been involved in producing the document, consistently catches errors and inconsistencies that the original author has become too familiar with the content to notice.
Redaction is a distinct service that has become increasingly important as clinical study data is routinely made available under transparency initiatives. We redact clinical documents to protect personal data and commercially sensitive information while preserving the scientific integrity and utility of the content.

QC review follows a structured checklist-based process, but it is not a mechanical exercise. Our reviewers read documents critically, checking factual accuracy against source data, internal consistency across sections, compliance with relevant guidelines, and adherence to style and formatting requirements.
Redaction work is carried out with a clear redaction strategy agreed in advance, specifying which categories of information will be removed or obscured and on what basis. We maintain a redaction log throughout and provide a clear audit trail of all changes made.
Get our latest news and publications
Sign up to our news letter








