• Search by category

  • Show all

Be the cool kid at congress....

August 3, 2014
Posters are an excellent opportunity to showcase your work, stimulate feedback, and build your research network [1,2]. However, many scientific posters contain excessive text and fail to communicate their key message clearly, limiting their effectiveness as communication tools [3,4]. In our recent Insider’s Insight we provide instructions on how to produce effective posters [5]. In brief:

Creating an effective poster for a scientific conference requires a balance between content clarity, visual appeal, and audience engagement [1,3]. The following principles are widely supported in the literature on scientific communication and information design:

Keep it simple and focused: Choosing a clear, concise title and focusing on a single central message improves comprehension and recall, particularly in time-limited viewing contexts such as poster sessions [3,6]. Conference attendees typically spend only a few minutes at each poster, making immediate clarity essential [4].

Use a logical structure: Organising posters using a familiar scientific structure (Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion) supports cognitive processing and helps readers navigate the content efficiently [1,7]. Clear headings and sub-headings act as visual signposts, improving information retrieval [6].

Limit text, maximise graphics: Excessive text reduces engagement and readability, whereas visual representations such as graphs and diagrams allow complex data to be understood more rapidly [3,8]. Studies of visual cognition suggest that limiting text and prioritising figures enhances comprehension and memory [9].

Prioritise readability: Large font sizes and simple, sans-serif fonts improve legibility at a distance and reduce visual fatigue [4,10]. Adequate contrast between text and background is essential for accessibility and rapid information processing [9].

Optimise colour usage: Strategic colour use can guide attention and reinforce structure, but excessive or poorly chosen colours may distract or confuse viewers [8,9]. Consideration of colour-vision deficiencies is recommended to ensure accessibility [10].

Include high-quality visuals: High-resolution figures with clear labels and legends are essential for accurate interpretation of results [7]. Well-designed graphics can function as stand-alone summaries of findings, supporting rapid understanding [8].

Align elements and use white space: Consistent alignment and effective use of white space reduce cognitive load and improve visual flow, making posters easier to scan and interpret [6,9].

Engage with a strong introduction and conclusion: A brief contextual introduction helps viewers understand the relevance of the work, while a clear conclusion reinforces the key take-home message and implications [1,3].

Prepare for interaction: Poster presentations are interactive by nature. Including contact details facilitates follow-up and collaboration, while preparing a short verbal explanation enhances engagement during poster sessions [2,4].

Proofread and test: Errors in grammar, spelling, or figure labelling undermine credibility and distract from the scientific message [7]. Pilot viewing of posters from a distance is recommended to ensure readability and coherence [4].

While many guidelines describe what makes a good poster, effective execution remains challenging [3,5]. To engage your audience, posters should make clear, explicit statements supported by the data, while avoiding unnecessary detail [6]. Making contact information visible and being present to discuss the work further enhances the poster’s impact as a scientific communication tool [2].

By following these principles, authors can create visually appealing, professional posters that effectively communicate research findings to conference audiences [1,3]. Our guide also highlights useful online resources and free poster templates (portrait and landscape), as well as a poster design selector [5].

References

  1. Rowe N, Ilic D. What impact do posters have on academic knowledge transfer? A pilot survey on author attitudes and experiences. BMC Med Educ. 2009;9:71.
  2. Rowe N, Ilic D. Poster Presentation – a visual medium for academic and scientific meetings. Paediatr Respir Rev.2011;12(3):208–213.
  3. Hess GR, Tosney KW, Liegel LH. Creating effective poster presentations: AMEE Guide No. 40. Med Teach. 2009;31(4):319–321.
  4. Day RA, Gastel B. How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper. 6th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
  5. Niche Science & Technology Ltd. An Insider’s Insight into Poster Presentations. 2014.
  6. Gopen GD, Swan JA. The science of scientific writing. Am Sci. 1990;78(6):550–8.
  7. Zeiger M. Essentials of Writing Biomedical Research Papers. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2000.
  8. Tufte ER. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire (CT): Graphics Press; 2001.
  9. Wickens CD, Hollands JG. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall; 2000.
  10. Schriver KA. Dynamics in document design: creating text for readers. New York: Wiley; 1997.

About the author

Tim Hardman
Managing Director
View profile
Dr Tim Hardman is Managing Director of Niche Science & Technology Ltd., a bespoke services CRO based in the UK, and a keen and occasional commentator on science, business and the process of drug development. He also serves occasionally as acting Scientific Director for the healthcare agency Phase II International, specialising in medical strategy and communication.

Social Shares

Subscribe for updates

* indicates required

Related Articles

Get our latest news and publications

Sign up to our news letter

© 2025 Niche.org.uk     All rights reserved

HomePrivacy policy Corporate Social Responsibility